Is Ice Bathing Healthy? What the Studies Really Show – and What They Don't

What happens in the body

Cold water triggers an alarm reaction within seconds: breathing becomes fast and shallow, pulse and blood pressure rise, the vessels in the arms and legs constrict. That is the cold shock, and it is the reason for most of the risks (more on that below). At the same time the body releases stress hormones – and they are the reason for what most people describe after the bath as alertness and clarity.

How strong that reaction is was measured by a Czech research group in young men: after one hour up to the neck in 14 °C water, the noradrenaline level in the blood was 530 percent higher, dopamine 250 percent higher, and the metabolic rate rose by 350 percent. Adrenaline stayed unchanged, and cortisol – the classic "stress hormone" – did not rise but tended to fall¹. An hour at 14 °C is, however, a laboratory protocol and not an ice bath as you would take it at home.

Closer to practice is a Finnish study with twenty healthy women: ten of them stepped into 0–2 °C water for 20 seconds three times a week for twelve weeks, another ten went into a cold chamber at −110 °C for two minutes. After both kinds of cold, noradrenaline rose to two to three times its level every time, consistently over the whole twelve weeks. Cortisol and ACTH did not rise; from the fourth week on they were actually lower than at the start, a sign of habituation – the source reports this for both groups together². Two small individual studies – there is no pooled data on this – but a consistent picture: cold strongly activates the sympathetic nervous system without driving up the cortisol axis.

Effect 1: mood and alertness

Evidence: indications from small studies.

This is the effect everyone at our place notices first when they climb out of the tub for the first time. In two small studies, participants reported better mood immediately after the bath^{4, 5}; a further study observed changes over four months³. That is why it counts as "indications" and not as "proven".

In a British study, 42 students spent up to 20 minutes (18.6 minutes on average) in 13.6 °C sea water without swimming; 22 stayed on land as a control group. The total score of a mood questionnaire (POMS) fell in the bathing group from 51 to 36 points, in the control group only from 42 to 40. Vigour and self-esteem rose; tension, anger, depression, fatigue and confusion fell⁴. The participants were not randomly assigned, they were young and fit, and 18 minutes is not a beginner's protocol.

A second study put participants into an MRI scanner before and after five minutes in 20 °C water. Afterwards they felt more active, alert and attentive and less tense; at the same time there was a measurable change in how certain brain networks work together⁵. 20 °C, however, is not an ice bath.

Over a longer period: Finnish winter swimmers filled in mood questionnaires over four months. Tension, fatigue and negative mood decreased, and after four months they felt more energetic and active than a comparison group³. But the swimmers had chosen this themselves – anyone who voluntarily goes into the water in winter differs from the start from someone who does not.

Important for perspective: a meta-analysis from 2025 that pooled eleven randomised studies with 3,177 participants found no pooled effect on mood⁶. Conclusion: in two small studies mood was better immediately after the bath, and winter swimmers rate themselves better over months. Whether the effect lasts and whether it occurs in everyone, nobody knows.

Effect 2: stress

Evidence: indications.

The same meta-analysis found an interesting time pattern for stress: immediately after the bath and one hour later no effect was measurable, but twelve hours later a clearly lower stress score (standardised effect size −1.00). After 24 and 48 hours nothing of it remained⁶. At the same time, inflammation markers rose immediately and one hour after the bath – that is the body's acute stress response, not a contradiction, but not "anti-inflammatory" either.

This fits the Finnish observation that cortisol and ACTH do not rise with regular short cold exposure (winter swimming or cold chamber) and fall over the weeks². A common interpretation goes: anyone who practises a controlled stress stimulus while breathing calmly trains exactly the ability they need in a stressful situation. That is plausible – but as a mechanism it is an interpretation, not evidence.

Effect 3: muscle soreness and recovery

Evidence: well established – with one important exception.

This is the best-studied area, because sports physicians have used cold water for decades. A Cochrane review pooled 17 studies with 366 participants: those who bathed in cold water after training had less muscle soreness 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours later than with passive recovery (resting without any measure), and felt less tired immediately afterwards¹¹. The studies were small and of low quality, but the direction was consistent. Two later meta-analyses confirmed the effect; one of them found the best results at 10–15 °C and 10–15 minutes of immersion^{12, 13}.

The exception: if you want to build muscle, do not get into cold water directly after strength training. In an Australian study, 21 men did strength training for twelve weeks and after each session either spent ten minutes in cold water or cycled gently. Strength and muscle mass increased noticeably less in the cold-water group; the cross-section of the fast muscle fibres and the number of nuclei per fibre grew only in the comparison group. The cold dampens the signals the muscle needs to grow¹⁴. Two further studies confirm the picture: in 16 men who did strength training three times a week for seven weeks and then sat in 10 °C water for 15 minutes or rested passively, the fast muscle fibres grew only without cold; the gain in maximal strength on the leg press was similar in both groups¹⁸. In twelve young men who cooled both legs in cold water after strength training, the cooled muscles incorporated less protein from food over two weeks¹⁷. A narrative review sums it up: cold water after training dampens adaptations to strength training; for adaptations to endurance training it reports no impairment¹⁵. And a detail from a meta-analysis of 20 studies: directly after cold-water immersion, performance in the jump test (countermovement jump) was lower; muscle soreness and perceived exertion were lower immediately afterwards, creatine kinase (a marker of muscle damage) after 24 hours and lactate after 24 and 48 hours¹⁶. Against muscle soreness after training the bath is therefore well established; directly after strength training with a muscle-building goal it is counterproductive. What that means for your training plan is in the article for athletes.

Effect 4: cold adaptation, brown fat, metabolism

Evidence: indications – and caution when transferring them.

The body gets used to cold, that is undisputed. How and how strongly is described by three kinds of findings that have to be kept apart.

Cold water, observation: Danish researchers compared experienced winter swimmers, who go briefly into cold water two to three times a week and then into the sauna, with a control group. The swimmers responded to cold with stronger heat production and had a slightly lower core temperature at rest; their brown fat was not more active at rest than that of the controls²¹. That is a snapshot of people who chose this themselves and additionally use a sauna – cause and effect cannot be derived from it.

Cold air, controlled: The studies that measured brown fat most precisely do not work with water but with mild cold in room air over ten days. Afterwards the brown fat tissue was more active, non-shivering heat production was higher, and the participants found the cold more comfortable and shivered less¹⁹. In eight type 2 diabetics, insulin sensitivity rose by around 43 percent after ten days at 14–15 °C air temperature²⁰. That is a remarkable finding – but it is cold in the air, not an ice bath, and eight people.

Overview: A review of 104 studies concludes that cold water might reduce or convert fat tissue and improve insulin sensitivity, and that protection against metabolic and cardiovascular disease might follow from that. The authors stress: small groups, often only one sex, different temperatures – the topic "remains a subject of debate"²⁴.

To be honest: whether short ice baths measurably recruit brown fat has not been studied. And no study has shown weight loss from ice baths; more on that in the section "What is not established" and in the article Ice bathing and nutrition.

Effect 5: sick leave and the immune system

Evidence: indications for less sick leave, not established for a "stronger immune system".

The largest study on this topic comes from the Netherlands: 3,018 adults were randomly assigned to end their shower with 30, 60 or 90 seconds of cold water for 30 days – or to shower as usual. The cold showerers reported sick 29 percent less often (self-reported). For the number of sick days, by contrast, the study found no significant difference between the groups⁸. Why sick leave fell although sick days did not differ, the study does not answer; conceivable are more energy, a different perception of illness or simply the kind of person who sticks with a cold-shower study – those are guesses, not findings. And these were showers, not ice baths.

What happens in the blood was examined by the same Czech group that measured the hormone values: a single bath at 14 °C changed the immune system practically not at all. After six weeks with three baths a week there were small but measurable increases in some immune cells (monocytes, activated lymphocytes) and in the inflammatory messenger TNF-α; antibodies, the total count of white blood cells and the inflammation marker CRP stayed the same⁹. A clinical relevance – fewer infections – is not shown by that.

Often cited is the Radboud University study on the Wim Hof method: twelve trained men were injected with a bacterial toxin and, thanks to breathing technique and cold training, showed a clearly dampened inflammatory response and fewer flu-like symptoms than twelve untrained men¹⁰. But: what was trained was a combination of hyperventilation, meditation and ice water. What share the cold has in that cannot be told from the study. And the 2025 meta-analysis found no effect on immune function overall⁶.

Conclusion: people who bathe cold regularly often feel more resilient – and that is the effect that counts in everyday life. "Ice bathing strengthens the immune system" is just the wrong label for it: a claim the data does not support.

What is not established

On the internet – and formerly here too – there are promises for which there is no human study. So that you recognise them:

Risks and limits

The cold shock is no minor matter. A 2020 review concludes that cold-water swimming, when practised regularly and in a measured way by healthy, experienced people, is likely to bring health benefits – and that for the inexperienced there is a real risk of death, through the cold shock in the first seconds or through hypothermia²³. The first major review on the subject, from 2017, describes the same dangers – gasping, cardiac arrhythmia from the simultaneous stimulus of cold and breath-holding, drowning, hypothermia – and states explicitly on the benefit side that the evidence for many claims is "varied" and partly based on anecdote²².

So the rule is: never alone, get in slowly, head above water, and with cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, respiratory conditions or pregnancy see a doctor first. The full list and the rules for the first bath are in the beginner's guide.

Long-term effects

Evidence: indications from observational data.

There is no randomised long-term study of ice baths. What there is are observations of people who do it over months or years: the Finnish winter swimmers who felt more energetic after four months³; the Finnish women whose cortisol fell over twelve weeks of winter swimming or cold chamber while the noradrenaline response remained²; the Danish winter swimmers with stronger heat production and a lower core temperature²¹.

That shows cold adaptation and a better self-assessment. It does not prove a long-term health effect, because winter swimmers select themselves, often use a sauna as well, and nobody has compared them with a randomly formed group. Anyone who promises you "long-term studies" on ice baths has none.

How much does it take?

The studies examined very different doses – from 20 seconds to an hour:

A dose-response curve for health effects has not been studied; nobody knows whether two minutes at 10 °C do "more" than 30 seconds at 5 °C. Our practical value is therefore deliberately cautious and comes from experience, not from a study: 10 to 15 °C, one to two minutes, two to three times a week. How to get there is explained step by step in the beginner's guide, including the duration table.

Frequently asked questions

Sources

1. Šrámek P et al. (2000). Human physiological responses to immersion into water of different temperatures. Eur J Appl Physiol 81:436–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050065
2. Leppäluoto J et al. (2008). Effects of long-term whole-body cold exposures on plasma concentrations of ACTH, beta-endorphin, cortisol, catecholamines and cytokines in healthy females. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 68:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365510701516350
3. Huttunen P, Kokko L, Ylijukuri V (2004). Winter swimming improves general well-being. Int J Circumpolar Health 63:140–144. https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v63i2.17700
4. Kelly JS, Bird E (2021). Improved mood following a single immersion in cold water. Lifestyle Medicine 3(1):e53. https://doi.org/10.1002/lim2.53
5. Yankouskaya A et al. (2023). Short-Term Head-Out Whole-Body Cold-Water Immersion Facilitates Positive Affect and Increases Interaction between Large-Scale Brain Networks. Biology 12(2):211. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12020211
6. Cain T et al. (2025). Effects of cold-water immersion on health and wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 20(1):e0317615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317615
7. Shevchuk NA (2008). Adapted cold shower as a potential treatment for depression. Med Hypotheses 70:995–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2007.04.052
8. Buijze GA et al. (2016). The Effect of Cold Showering on Health and Work: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS One 11(9):e0161749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161749
9. Janský L et al. (1996). Immune system of cold-exposed and cold-adapted humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 72:445–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00242274
10. Kox M et al. (2014). Voluntary activation of the sympathetic nervous system and attenuation of the innate immune response in humans. PNAS 111(20):7379–7384. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322174111
11. Bleakley C et al. (2012). Cold-water immersion (cryotherapy) for preventing and treating muscle soreness after exercise. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD008262. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008262.pub2
12. Machado AF et al. (2016). Can Water Temperature and Immersion Time Influence the Effect of Cold Water Immersion on Muscle Soreness? Sports Med 46:503–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0431-7
13. Hohenauer E et al. (2015). The Effect of Post-Exercise Cryotherapy on Recovery Characteristics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 10(9):e0139028. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139028
14. Roberts LA et al. (2015). Post-exercise cold water immersion attenuates acute anabolic signalling and long-term adaptations in muscle to strength training. J Physiol 593(18):4285–4301. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP270570
15. Petersen AC, Fyfe JJ (2021). Post-exercise Cold Water Immersion Effects on Physiological Adaptations to Resistance Training and the Underlying Mechanisms in Skeletal Muscle: A Narrative Review. Front Sports Act Living 3:660291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.660291
16. Xiao F et al. (2023). Effects of cold water immersion after exercise on fatigue recovery and exercise performance – meta analysis. Front Physiol 14:1006512. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1006512
17. Fuchs CJ et al. (2020). Postexercise cooling impairs muscle protein synthesis rates in recreational athletes. J Physiol 598(4):755–772. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP278996
18. Fyfe JJ et al. (2019). Cold water immersion attenuates anabolic signaling and skeletal muscle fiber hypertrophy, but not strength gain, following whole-body resistance training. J Appl Physiol 127(5):1403–1418. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00127.2019
19. van der Lans AAJJ et al. (2013). Cold acclimation recruits human brown fat and increases nonshivering thermogenesis. J Clin Invest 123(8):3395–3403. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI68993
20. Hanssen MJW et al. (2015). Short-term cold acclimation improves insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Med 21:863–865. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3891
21. Søberg S et al. (2021). Altered brown fat thermoregulation and enhanced cold-induced thermogenesis in young, healthy, winter-swimming men. Cell Rep Med 2(10):100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100408
22. Tipton MJ et al. (2017). Cold water immersion: kill or cure? Exp Physiol 102(11):1335–1355. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP086283
23. Knechtle B et al. (2020). Cold Water Swimming – Benefits and Risks: A Narrative Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(23):8984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238984
24. Esperland D, de Weerd L, Mercer JB (2022). Health effects of voluntary exposure to cold water – a continuing subject of debate. Int J Circumpolar Health 81(1):2111789. https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2022.2111789